Horiemonfs Real Power and his Downfall

 

 

Contents

‡T. Livedoor Co. vs. Fuji Television Network, Inc.

‡U. Horiemonfs Three Types of Melancholy

A.     What is a Proper Process?

B.     Horie-Bashing by the Media

C.     Misunderstandings

‡V. Horiemonfs Positive Effects

A.       Professional Baseball Games: Interleague

B.       The Logic of the Hostile Purchase

C.       Biased Mass Communication

‡W. Live door Co. vs. the Sankei Newspaper

‡X. Horiemonfs Downfall

   A. Horiemon at his Height

   B. Horiemon in the Worst Case

   C. Horiemon in the Future

 

‡T. Livedoor Co. vs. Fuji Television Network, Inc.

     Almost all of the Japanese were deeply shocked by the news that Livedoor Co. acquired a

number of shares of NBS (Nippon Broadcasting, Inc.) on February 18, 2005. AERA published

by Asahi-Shimbun-Sha on February 21, 2005 said that according to the Asahi on March 17,

the shares which Livedoor Co. purchased reached 50 percent of the whole shares, guaranteeing

the right to vote in NBS. Livedoor President Takafumi Horie, who was nicknamed Horiemon

after a Japanese animated character, Doraemon, by the mass media, hinted that he was going

to control not only NBS but also Fuji Television Network, Inc. Although Livedoor Co. could buy

50 percent of NBSf shares, it was not successful in controlling Fuji TV because Fuji TV made

a strong stand against Livedoor. As a result, the relation between Livedoor Co. and Fuji

Television Network, Inc. was thrown into confusion. The confusion started by Livedoor Co.

continued for one month and resulted in having tremendous impact not only on the stock market

but also on the mass media in Japan.

     However, it was suddenly reported on April 18 that a settlement between Livedoor Co. and

Fuji TV had finally been reached. The following is the ideas of their reconciliation. First, Livedoor

Co. must sell all the shares of Nippon Broadcasting System, Inc. to Fuji TV. Next, Fuji TV must

furnish Livedoor Co. with funds, which means the newly issued shares allotted for a third party.

Finally, Livedoor Co. and Fuji TV must establish a committee in order to carry out a business

tie-up of the Internet and TV business. Although the mass media mostly regard this compromise

as an even bargain, these ideas of the reconciliation seem to be far from what Livedoor President

Takefumi Horie was pursuing at the beginning.

     Mr. Horie stated again and again that the purpose of purchasing NBSf shares was not to play

the money game but to reform the mass media through the tie-up of the Internet and broadcasting

business. He denounced the management of NBS through buying a large quantity of its shares.

Then he closed in on Fuji TV by saying prophetically that the Internet would replace TV in the

future. His assertion, however, was not valued. None of his plans for the reform of the professional

baseball system, the mass media or the stock market was rightly assessed. In the end, I imagine

that some depression was his legacy. The three depressions among his main ones are explained

in the next chapter.

 

‡U. Horiemonfs Three Types of Melancholy

@@@Horienmonfs ideal to buy Fuji Television Network, Inc. may have been too aggressive. Also,

his technique in reaching it may have been beyond the understanding of specialists as well as

amateurs of economics. As most Japanese people know, he tried to take part in the management

of professional baseball last year, but an Internet service company Rakuten, Inc. suddenly

appeared in rivalry with Livedoor Co. Finally, Hiroshi Mikitani, President of Rakuten, Inc.,

was chosen as the owner of the professional baseball team by a selection committee. As a result,

not Mr. Horie but Mr. Mikitani acquired the right to establish a new professional baseball team,

which is now called the Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles.

The criteria for selection at that time were not so clear, however. Certainly, more baseball
f
ans supported Livedoor Co. than Rakuten, Inc. They were for Mr. Horie because he had officially
announced his strong desire to get into the professional baseball business earlier than Mr. Mikitani.
Mr. Horiefs faithful attitude found wider support among the people. In fact, it was not clear why
Livedoor Co. could not get into the professional business and Rakuten, Inc. could. Then I formed
the impression that the selection committee had chosen Rakuten, Inc. because it is a larger company
than Livedoor Co.

A similar phenomenon happened when Mr. Horie bought the shares of Nippon Broadcasting
System, Inc. this year. A great proportion of people had sympathy for Horiemonfs ideal, but after
some time, Horiemon-bashing was caused by the mass media, sympathizers of the Fuji-Sankei
Communications Group (including NBS and Fuji TV). Although his ideal was extremely justifiable,
Horiemon was often criticized for his informal fashion and misunderstood for his honest comments.
These criticisms and misunderstandings must have depressed him considerably.

 

A. What Is a Proper Process?

     As I stated before, Livedoor President Takafumi Horie acquired a great number of shares of

Nippon Broadcasting System, Inc. (NBS) through buying shares in extra hours. Some people

condemned him for the possible illegality of his act although NBS planned to increase its stock

holdings in order to protect the company against the attack of Livedoor Co. After all, it was not

Livedoor Co. but Fuji TV and NBS that acted illegally. The defense plan which NBS and Fuji TV

adopted was judged to be illegal both by the Tokyo District Court and by the Tokyo High Court.

What Mr. Horie did might have been contrary to commercial ethics, but it was not against the law.

However, those who had sympathized with NBS and Fuji Television Network, Inc. gave a loud cry

that Mr. Horie should have bought the shares of NBS through a right process.

Their opinions may have been true superficially, but their views hinted to us that they were
one-sided and malicious. Remember how Horiemon was treated when he tried to get into the
professional baseball business. He persisted in his views with a fair and square attitude. In spite of
his efforts, however, his request was refused by the ownersf conference of the Japanese professional
baseball organization. Finally, a Japanese Internet shopping company, Rakuten Co., succeeded in
establishing a new professional baseball team although it departed later than Livedoor Co.

The argument that the professional baseball leagues should be unified became heated two
years ago. The owner of the Yomiuri Giants, Tsuneo Watanabe, and the owner of the Seibu Lions,
Yoshiaki Tsutsumi, emphasized the idea. Then Mr. Horie appealed to the Japan Professional
Baseball Organization to join the organization by saying that he had sufficient funds to buy a
professional baseball team. In spite of his enthusiastic attitude, neither Mr. Watanabe nor Mr.
Tsutsumi took notice. The Japanese professional baseball leagues continued to assert that they
would make todayfs two baseball leagues one by combining the Orix Bluewave and the Kintetsu
Buffaloes. He persuaded the owners of professional baseball teams in good faith so that he could
become a member of the professional baseball organization, but his wish was not realized.

One of the reasons that Livedoor Co. was rejected by the owners of professional baseball
teams was trivial. Some owners said that Livedoor Co. had an Internet adult site, so it lacked
dignity as an owner of a professional baseball team. This was a horrible false accusation. It is true
that he was always in casual clothes, but he had never lost his dignity. No. If anything, the prime
owners of Japanese professional baseball teams were responsible for losing their dignity. One of
them, the owner of the Yomiuri Giants, Tsuneo Watanabe, resigned his post immediately for
carrying out an irresponsible act, and another of them, the owner of the Seibu Lions, Yoshiaki
Tsutsumi, was arrested on suspicion of insider trading. Were both Mr. Watanabe and Mr. Tsutsumi
qualified to criticize Mr. Horie? In the end, Rakuten Co. succeeded in establishing a new
professional baseball team by stealing a march on Livedoor Co. This seemed to have given
Horiemon his first melancholy.

 

B. Horie-Bashing by the Media

     The fundamental tone of the editorials of the Asahi on the Livedoor incident was not well

disposed to him. For example, the title of the editorial on March 24, 2005 was gMr. Horie, you

are not equal to the task.h The editorial criticized him for buying shares in extra hours. When

Livedoor Co. made peace with Fuji Television Network, Inc., the editorial on April 19 gave

Horiemon candid advice by making fun of him; Is this also soteinai (within your assumption),

which is Mr. Horiefs hackneyed expression? Of course, the editorial writer seemed to expect

that the idea to settle the matter was not within his assumption. Although I found in advance

that the Sankei and the Yomiuri held unfavorable opinions of Horiemon, I did not expect

the Asahi to hold unfavorable opinions of Horiemon, too. (Horiefs cliche, Soteinai, won a grand

prize of the New and Vogue Word Contest, Shin-GoERyuko-Go Taisho, in 1995.)

As stated above, the Asahi seemed to keep some distance from Horiemon. Furthermore,
some celebrities having some connection with NBS or Fuji Television, such as Tamori, Kinichi
Hagimoto and So Kuramoto, declared that they would quit if Horiemon became the owner of
NBS (and Fuji Television). One day, one of NBSf announcers abruptly asked Horiemon in a
press interview, gWho owns the radio station?h He clearly intended to draw the answer from
Horiemon that the radio station belongs to the investors. This question sounded definitely silly
to me, because the answer is quite simple; the radio station belongs to everyone including not
only investors but also fans and the staff of the radio station. The questioner who asked such a
malicious question evidently tended to attack and look down on Horiemon.

The critical attitude of the mass media against Horiemon had an extremely incisive
tongue. A few weeks ago, Ayako Otobe, a public relation staff member of Livedoor Co., often
appeared on the TV stage as a responsible person of a public relations department on behalf of
Mr. Horie. Since she often appeared on television, Masaru Nashimoto, a famous reporter of
Japanese public entertainment, reported over the radio that a certain publisher asked her to
publish a collection of her nude photographs because she was very beautiful. How mean it was
of Mr. Nashimoto to quote the otherfs words of sexual harassment! The spreading of such a
groundless story by the mass media seemed to have caused Horiemon his second melancholy.

 

C. Misunderstandings

Yoichi Ito, one of the news commentators of gMorimoto Takuro Stand-Byh (a morning news
program of TBS radio) said in the corner of gNews Zoom-UPh that USEN-NET Co., a media
contents company which handles optical fiber systems, would purchase Nikkatsu Corporation,
which is a subsidiary of NAMCO Ltd. According to the commentator, USEN-NET intended to
buy Nikkatsu Romanticism Pornographic Films, Nikkatsu Roman Poruno, rather than Nikkatsu
Corporation. He explained that Internet pictures were suited to pornographic films, because it
did not matter a bit even if the pictures were somewhat blurred. According to Mr. Ito, USEN-NET Co.
would make a profit by putting advertisements in the Internet blue films. In fact, his comment on the
radio was nothing but an irrelevant charge against Mr. Horie. At last, he criticized Horiemon by
saying that the tie-up of the Internet and movies had been already started by YUSEN-Net Co. and
that Horiemonfs plan had never been new.       

However, it will be proved later that the business tie-up with NBS and Fuji Television Network,
Inc. which Horienmon undertook to carry out was not irresponsible but extremely serious being
different from Mr. Itofs commentary on Horiemon, although his straight speech and behavior
created some rejection among a number of Japanese people.

     Next, by buying Nippon Broadcasting System Co. and Fuji Television Network, Inc,

Horiemon certainly intended to control the whole the Fuji-Sankei Communications Group.

At the beginning, Horiemon planned to change the Sankei Shimbun into a literally

industrial-economic newspaper just like the Nihon Keizai Shimbun, because the Sankei

Shimbun did not neutrally deal with industry or the economy according to Horiemon. In

particular, the Fuji Sankei Communications Group was well known for their biased media

contents. For instance, a Japanese weekly, Shukan-Asahi (April 8, 2005), reported on a

relationship between Fuji Television Network, which belongs to the Fuji Sankei Communications

Group, and an organized group of gangsters. Horiemon might have wanted to change the media

system of the Fuji Sankei Communications Group.

Horiemon appeared to be planning to change the media contents of Fuji TV, too. He proposed
that Internet broadcasting would be effective for mutual communications between TV stations
and audiences. It was certain that even the media could not keep up with Horiemonfs drastic
reform based on his lofty ideal. The media seemed to have misunderstood Horiemon concerning
his investment standing. The misunderstandings of Mr. Ito would become causes of Horiemonfs
melancholy, just as those of the mass media had already done.

 

‡V. Horiemonfs Positive Effects

@@@The mass media shifted the responsibilities of todayfs confusion to Horiemon.

Most of them were caused by some misunderstandings. On the contrary, he produced

good results on various parts of the Japanese community. Although Horiemonfs results

were not yet fully realized, most people did not yet realize this, and describing some of

them clearly will be the shortest way to understanding Horiemon impartially.  

 

A.    Professional Baseball Games: Interleague

@@@A proposal to unify the Central and the Pacific Leagues messed up the professional

baseball world in Japan. Tsuneo Watanabe and Yoshiaki Tsutsumi, who emphasized its

necessity, had already retired from their posts. When Horiemon offered to buy the Kintetsu

Buffaloes, Mr. Watanabe, boss of the Yomiuri Giants, refused to meet him without giving

any reasons. Although Horiemon was also refused by the owners of the Japanese

professional baseball teams for the reason that his company was not qualified to be an

owner, Yoshiaki Tsutsumi, President of Kokudo Co. Ltd., was arrested on suspicion of insider

trading. In addition, Mr. Watanabe also took responsibility for unfair expenses for obtaining

rookies and left the Yomiuri Giants. The idea of one league miscarried last year through the

downfalls of Mr. Watanabe and Mr. Tsutsu.

@@@Although Horiemon had failed to buy a professional baseball team, Rakuten Co.

established a new team: the Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles. Now most baseball fans are

pleased to have two leagues because they are enjoying the interleague professional baseball

games between the Central and the Pacific Leagues. For example, the Asahi on May 24, 2005

reported that the interleague had made the Central League more exciting. According to the

same newspaper, the Yomiuri Giants rank first, while the Chunichi Dragons are in the

second-lowest position among the twelve professional teams last year. As a result, an article

of the Asahi read that the interleague became very useful for making Japanese professional

baseball games more exciting.

@@@But just think about it. To whom do we owe our success in the interleague? There was

nobody but Horiemon. The interleague was founded because two leagues were supported by

Horiemon. Thanks to his action, professional baseball fans were able to enjoy the Japan Series

in the autumn as they had been. After all, it was thanks to Horiemon that Japanese professional

baseball games could enjoy both the interleague and the Japan Series.

 

B.    The Logic of the Hostile Purchase

     @As has been pointed out so far, the dividends of Japanese companies are said to be

extremely low in Japan compared to overseas companies. The cornering of stocks which

Horiemon put into practice aimed to protect stockholdersf benefits. Owing to him, the dividends

 of Japanese companies seem to have gone up from approximately ten percent to twenty

percent of the net profit, although those of foreign companies were then said to be about thirty

or forty percent. Horiemon unexpectedly brought out a problem between stockholders and

managers. An answer to this question has not been settled in todayfs Japanese companies.

Managers have to be responsible for making their business more and more prosperous. As a

result, they would not share their benefits with investors. However, Horiemon said that

stockholders should be treated better because they had invested in their companies in order

to support them. Horiemon was one of the pioneers who applied a light to the dark part of

investment in companies. A number of investors, who had been ignored by managers, began

to realize that Horiemon was protecting their deserved profits.

     @On the other hand, executives who had recognized their defects started to protect themselves.

TBS (Tokyo Broadcasting Station) and Nippon Television Co. Ltd. recently came out with a new

defense policy against the hostile purchase of shares because they were afraid of an attack by

another Horiemon. Although a hostile purchase might be a threat to the management, it seems

to be an extremely useful way to help a company deal with thorny problems. A hostile purchase

of stocks is apt to become profitable not only to stockholders but also to laborers. Most Japanese

mass media has been criticizing the hostile purchase of stocks as a deed without charity or

righteousness even now. However, it was certain that Horiemon gave Nippon Hoso Co. and

Fuji Television Co., Ltd. an opportunity to reconsider their broadcasting contents. Hisashi Hieda,

chairman of Fuji Television Network, Inc., often said, gEverything that is not fun is anti-television;

in other words, all TV programs have to be fun.h I did not want him to say such remarks because

Fuji TV was filled with a lot of rush variety shows.     It was sometimes pointed out that some

programs of Fuji television had a bad influence on young people. I could not but think that the

root of all evil in broadcasting business exists in his remarks, gTV programs have to be fun.h

Fuji TV, however, continued to broadcast some programs that seemed to be harmful although

they were popular among young people.

 

C. Biased Mass Communication

     @Depending upon how you think of it, it may be peoplefs common opinion that all mass

communication is biased. For example, there is a reputation that NHK is prejudiced in favor

of the Liberal Democratic Party, the Sankei is to the extreme right, the Yomiuri is to the right,

the Mainichi stands in the middle between the Yomiuri and the Asahi and the Asahi is liberal.

     @Now, allow me to examine ga PR versionh (an advertisement page) of the Asahi published

in the summer of 2004. The version definitely worked out the standpoint of the Asahifs editorials.

The newspaper pointed out differences among them in the column of the same page. It said, gThe

assertions of editorials are not the same. Namely, they are often keenly opposed to each other.

The Asahi has sometimes been in opposition to the Yomiuri and the Sankei, and it has lately been

varguing against some issues such as approval or disapproval of the Iraqi War, dispatching the

Self Defense Forces to Iraq, the compulsion to sing the national anthem and raise the national

flag at graduation ceremonies and so on. It was my decision that the Asahi had mostly judged the

right conclusion concerning these issues. For this reason, if I had enough money to buy the

Yomiuri Co. or the Sankei Newspaper Co. Ltd. I would like to change them into more liberal

newspaper companies just as Horiemon tried to.

     @While I was thinking over biased mass communication, I came across a terrible article which

 was written by Motohiro Takahata in Yomiuri Weekly (May 5-15, 2005, Vol. 2971, p. 92). He

blamed a court of justice for turning a blind eye to future evil because of its wrong judgments.

In fact, the dispute with Livedoor and Fuji TV about issuing a large quantity of tickets to reserve

new stocks was approved by the Tokyo High Court as well as the Tokyo District Court. However,

Mr. Takahata wrote, gThe administration of justice was defeated by Horiemon.h Additionally, he

made a false charge against the judicature by quoting Tatsuo Uemura; professor of Waseda

University. Mr. Takahatafs opinion was that the administration of justice had decided on a case

after fashion. If NBS and Fuji TV complained about it as he wrote, they should have appealed

to the Supreme Court. Although they gave up such an effort, how regrettable it was for them to

comment on the judgments of the Tokyo District Court and the Tokyo High Court. What was
exceedingly important here was the oppression by mass communication which would be capable

of any crime to destroy the judicial community so as to hold out their own views.

 

‡W. Livedoor Co. vs. the Sankei Newspaper

     @The report of AERA (A weekly published by Asahi Shimbun Co.) on February 21 in 2005

was the beginning of the dispute between Horiemon and the Sankei Shimbun. The headline

gHorie is Plotting to Control the Fuji-Sankei Group (though Horie and Horiemon is a same person)h

was radical enough to shock them terribly. According to the report, after Horie made introductory

remarks that the following was his private opinion, he said, gThose groupsf opinions are out of the

ordinary and Ifd like to strengthen the entertainment aspects of those groups.h His expression,

however, touched the heartstrings of the Sankei Shimbun. The Sankei lost no time in refuting

Horiefs opinion in the editorial of the same newspaper on February 18, the title of which was,

gDo you really mean to control the SANKEI? How about saying it after considering for a minute?h

It seemed that the tendency of the editorial was to get extremely carried away by their feelings.

     @The editorial asserted, taking a highhanded attitude, gIt is needless to say that the Sankei

has been based on seiron-rosen,h which means an anti-communism line. Anyway, the assertion o

f the Sankei is nothing but treasuring their creed. Frankly speaking, Mr. Horie intended to change

this line seriously. That is why he proposed that the Sankei should be an industrial and economic

newspaper such as the Nihon Keizai Shimbun. Considering the recent dispute between the Asahi and

the Sankei, Horiefs statement seemed to be right. For instance, the Asahi published a PR version of

the newspaper last year. According to this, the Yomiuri as well as the Sankei entirely objected to the

Asahi over various kinds of controversial social and political issues such as the national anthem and

flag of Japan, amending the Japanese Constitution, the Iraqi War, the Imperial Family and the

self-responsibility of abducted people in Iraq. Their results had been already decided; that is, they

were based on seiron-rosen. They were heading for a revision of the Constitution, denouncing those

who were against the Iraqi War and forcing teachers to stand up in front of the Japanese flag and

sing the national anthem in unison just as before the war. Honestly speaking, their opinions,

seiron-rosen, were apt to be right-wing. Horie seemed to have objected to those of the Sankei and

the Yomiuri. The said editorial declared, gNeglecting seiron is nothing but blaspheming against

180 authors of the large-scale column.h Was such a comment a cool-headed refutation against

the Asahi? Horie has no longer asserted his plan to alter the Sankei Shimbun since Horie-bashing

had begun.

     @After that, the Sankei was extremely persistent in blaming Horie. On February 18, the Sankei

used the interviews with a powerful politician, Yoshiro Mori, and the president of Mitsubishi Shoji Co.,

Mikio Sasaki, against Horiefs overtime dealing with stocks. What was worse, Shinichi Sanofs

contribution in the form of talk was beyond general logic. The title was gA rare animal causing

the suspicion of the mass media.h His conclusion was anti-logical and filled with malice. He proclaimed

in his column, gHoriefs next generation media is just something like putting a pair of glasses which a

TV personality is wearing up for network auction. Horie has only a low level awareness of the

next-generation media.h In addition, he also declared, gHorie has no ability or philosophy to answer

difficult questions to the Internet.h His remarks were quite irrelevant and just seemed to intend to

abuse Horie severely. The dispute between Horie and the Sankei is nothing but a terrible offensive

and defensive battle beyond all proper logic.

 

‡X. Horiemonfs Downfall

A. Horiemon at his Height

     @Horiemon caused some social phenomena, one of which was to have given dreams to young

Japanese people. For example, there was a growing tendency for them to begin to begin to

promote an undertaking. The Asahi reported on February 14, 2006 that Hitotsubashi University,

one of the Japanese famous national universities, began lectures on starting an enterprise for

university students. According to the above newspaper, twenty students and five adult members

of society, from their thirties to their seventies, attended gLectures on Starting a Business of

Communityh in 2005. In fact, Horiemon established On the Edge Co. Ltd. with a capital of

600 million yen while at Tokyo University, and he made his mark in business by buying up

Livedoor Co. Ltd. Encouraging young people to start an enterprise may be one of Horiemonfs

good influences.

Moreover, another of Horiemonfs careers was that he came forward as a candidate for
the House of Representatives in 2005. He contested a seat in the House of Representatives
with Shizuka Kamei, a veteran member of the Diet, in a Hiroshima electoral zone. Since
Mr. Kamei had been criticizing the Koizumi Administration, the mass media called Horiemon
as a rival candidate shikaku, which means an assassin. Almost all of his attempts, for example,
entering professional baseball teams as an owner, controlling the management of Nippon
Broadcasting, Inc. and Fuji Television Network, Inc. and standing for the Diet, were unsuccessful.
However, a number of his supporters admitted that his every challenge had been trying to break
down the old Japanese system and to carve young peoplefs way to fortune. Unexpectedly, a
terrible thing happened to Horiemon, who seemed to have exceedingly smooth sailing as a
young businessman.

 

B. Horiemon in the Worst Case

gAlmost all of the Japanese were deeply shocked by the news that c.h Do you remember
this sentence? To tell the truth, this is the sentence at the beginning of this essay. However, on
 writing the end of this essay, almost all the Japanese were more deeply shocked by the news
that Horiemonfs home and the head office of Livedoor in
Roppongi-Hills Building were forcibly
investigated by the special investigation department of the
Tokyo district public prosecutorfs
office on
January 16, 2006. To the house search was added Horiemonfs arrest on January 23.
His He was arrested on suspicion of breaking the stock exchange law. Ryoji Miyauchi, director,
Fumito Okamoto, director and Nagaya Nakamura, company president, were captured with
Horiemon, who was arrested again for a false mention of a report on securities (an act to violate
the stock exchange law) with Fumito Kumagai, representative director, on February 22.

All the arrested suspects were imprisoned in Tokyo Prison, whose previous name is Kosuge
Prison, where the late Kakuei Tanaka was imprisoned thirty years ago. Okamoto was released
on bail on March 16, Nakamura on March 17, and Kumagai on April 5 because all of them
admitted the allegations by saving that they had committed a crime according to Horiemonfs
instructions. However, Horiemon never admitted the allegations, so he was the only one that
was imprisoned until April 26.

 

C.     Horiemon in the Future

     Horiemon is still pleading not guilty to a criminal charge. His main crime was the false

representation on valuable papers which Livedoor Co. Ltd. had possessed. It showed a loss

of about 313 million yen in September 2004, but the above company made a false report

that it brought a profit of more or less 5034 million yen. In addition, Horiemon was felt

to be under suspicion: Gikei-Torihiki, deceptive dealings to betray investors and Fusetsu-No-Rufu,

and starting an ungrounded rumor in the stock market. Horiemon is to be on trial in the future.

He will go to court over the above-mentioned suspicions. It is said that Horiemon is preparing

for a public trial. He is now an accused person. To view a matter objectively, his trial seems to

be harsh. However, judgment has not been delivered on Horiemon yet. His future is still in

the gprogressive form.h

Lastly, I have to apologize for calling him Mr. Horie, not defendant Horie in this essay.
Since the most part of this essay was written before Horie was arrested, I did not want to lose
Horiemonfs good aspects. Furthermore, I did not want to call him defendant Horie in order to
avoid complexity.


Copyright@(c)@2006, Edmond N. Beard